Results

Outcomes that hold up to a post‑engagement audit.

Q: Do you work with private-equity portfolio companies?

Yes — a meaningful share of our book is PE-sponsored. We're comfortable with the cadence: 100-day plans, value-creation roadmaps, lender reporting, and carve-out complexity. Outcomes-based engagement models fit particularly well.

Every number we put on a slide is traced back to a PO, a contract clause, or a verified supplier quote. This is the shape of a typical V3 strategic sourcing engagement.

18–22^%

Addressable savings

Realized within 9–12 months

4.8×

ROI on fees

Year‑one, conservative case

35^%

Supplier base reduction

With expanded dual‑source coverage

98^%

On‑time PPAP rate

Across qualified LCC transitions

Typical industry ranges · Illustrative · Actuals vary by category

Illustrative savings waterfall — $80M indirect category

Baseline spend

100%

Should‑cost reset

−6%

LCC resourcing

−9%

Consolidation

−3%

Commercial terms

−2%

Net savings

20%

Case snapshots

Anonymized engagement shapes.

Every engagement is governed by NDA — these are the archetypes, not the names.

Snapshot 01

Global toy & leisure manufacturer — China rebalance

80–85% of BOM concentrated in China

Board mandate to cut concentration without breaking the P&L. V3 qualified alternates across Vietnam, India, and Mexico; ran staged awards into IP‑sensitive categories; co‑owned the PPAP timeline with engineering.

20–30%

China volume shifted in ~12 months

Snapshot 02

Tier‑1 industrial OEM — supplier recovery

Strategic supplier drifting on PPM and FAI

Replacing was slow; fixing required capacity the internal team didn't have. V3 went on‑site, mapped the process, identified root causes, and co‑owned a recovery plan with supplier leadership.

60–90 days

Typical stabilization window

Snapshot 03

Multi‑site manufacturer — tail‑spend cleanup

20% of spend, 80% of suppliers, no category ownership

Tail‑spend analytics surfaced maverick buying patterns and duplicate suppliers. Consolidation playbook compressed the supplier count and pulled spend back under managed channels.

8–12%

Tail‑spend savings realized

Archetypes · Anonymized · Ranges drawn from typical V3 engagements

FAQ — Outcomes

Questions procurement leaders actually ask.

How quickly do savings materialize?+

Addressable savings typically show up in booked POs within 4–6 months of engagement kickoff, with full run‑rate realized in 9–12 months for most categories. Complex regulated categories (pharma, aero) take longer — we're upfront about that from day one.

How does V3 verify the savings numbers it reports?+

Every savings number traces back to a purchase order, a contract clause, or a verified supplier quote against a CFO‑approved baseline. For outcomes‑based engagements, we run a quarterly audit and true‑up with your finance team so there is no ambiguity on what was realized.

Do you work with private‑equity portfolio companies?+

Yes — a meaningful share of our book is PE‑sponsored. We're comfortable with the cadence: 100‑day plans, value‑creation roadmaps, lender reporting, and carve‑out complexity. Outcomes‑based engagement models fit particularly well.

Request a diagnostic →